![]() If filing issues in GitHub is not feasible, send email to ( comment archive). It is free to create a GitHub account to file issues. Although the proposed Success Criteria in this document reference issues trackingĭiscussion, the Working Group requests that public comments be filed as new issues, ![]() To comment, file an issue in the W3C WCAG GitHub repository. At some point additional changes might be incorporated into an Edited or Amended Recommendation. This incorporates errata and are described in the change log. This is a Recommendation of WCAG 2.1 by the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group. Publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found This section describes the status of thisĭocument at the time of its publication. Of WCAG when developing or updating Web accessibility policies. ![]() The W3C also encourages use of the most current version While WCAG 2.0 remainsĪ W3C Recommendation, the W3C advises the use of WCAG 2.1 to maximize future applicability Publication of WCAG 2.1 does not deprecate or supersede WCAG 2.0. The WG intends that for policies requiringĬonformance to WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1 can provide an alternate means of conformance. ![]() Content thatĬonforms to WCAG 2.1 also conforms to WCAG 2.0. WCAG 2.1 extends Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, which was published as a W3C Recommendation December 2008. See Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview for an introduction and links to WCAG technical and educational material. General information about interpreting the success criteria, is provided in separateĭocuments. Guidance about satisfying the success criteria in specific technologies, as well as WCAG 2.1 success criteria are written as testable statements that are not technology-specific. Will also often make Web content more usable to users in general. Web content on desktops, laptops, tablets, and mobile devices. These guidelines address accessibility of More accessible to a wider range of people with disabilities, including accommodationsįor blindness and low vision, deafness and hearing loss, limited movement, speechĭisabilities, photosensitivity, and combinations of these, and some accommodationįor learning disabilities and cognitive limitations but will not address every user Following these guidelines will make content Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 covers a wide range of recommendationsįor making Web content more accessible. Open with subject line … message topic … ( archives) Errata: Errata exists. Joshue O Connor ( Invited Expert, InterAccess) W3C Recommendation 21 September 2023 More details about this document This version: Latest published version: Latest editor's draft: History: Commit history Implementation report: Previous Recommendation: Editors: Andrew Kirkpatrick ( Adobe) For that one moment, someone saw my reality.Īnd I defeated another bout of agoraphobia.Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Then I pay for my ice cream and go back into hiding. I just calmly explain through the tears that, even with treatment, this is normal for me. It's very easy to dismiss something when you never see the reality. I hate being told I'd be prettier if I could lie more convincingly, getting hit with the sledgehammer of happy: My brain is ripping itself apart, and all I want is a pint of ice cream, not a reminder of how unsightly it is to venture into public.Īfter understanding the psychology behind the recent measles outbreaks though, I've actually begun hiding less during episodes so that other people SEE the suffering. That just makes it harder for us to gather the nerve to explain why it sucks.Īs someone with life-long, treatment-resistant, sometimes severe depression, the pressure to SMILE is overwhelming.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |